The Importance of Computer Technology in Setting Up a Project Management System

In the world of globalization, Information system is Reuse staff and skills on other projects;
such where data are collected, classified and put into Protect investment in analysis and design, and to
process interpreting the result thereon in order toallow freedom in implementation techniques.
provide an integrated series of information forSSADM consists of three main components:
further communicating and analyzing. In a The structure or framework of an SSADM
progressively more spirited worldwide atmosphere,project
Information System plays the role as ‘enabler A set of standard analysis and design techniques
and facilitator’, which endows with tactical values The products of each technique
to the officialdom and considerable step up to theThe structure of SSADM might appear a little
excellence of administration. ‘An Informationcomplex at first, but will make more sense as we
System is a particular type of work system thatbegan to look at the method in more detail. Following
uses information technology to detain, put on the air,diagram illustrates the breakdown of the life cycle
store, retrieve, manipulate or display information,into a hierarchy of modules, stages, steps and
thereby partisan one or more other worktasks.Each module represents a SSADM phase, and is
structure’. In totting up to taking sidesmade up of one or two stages. Where a module
assessment making, co-ordination and control,contains two stages, one will be an analysis or design
information systems may also help managers andand the other will be a project decision stage. Each
workers investigate problems, envisage complexstages is made up of between two to seven steps,
subjects and generate new merchandise or services.which provide the framework for applying and
The criteria of operational  systems and the idatacontrolling the development techniques. The tasks to
management  systems that support analytically passbe carried out within each step define how the
through at least four phases: a) Introducing thetechniques should be used, and specify the required
system  of manipulating the need to promulgate standard of the products output from the step.
on going operational Management  system b)Following diagram shows the breakdown of SSADM's
development of  the process of acquiring andmodules and stages.The major analysis techniques
configuring/installing the necessary hardware,mainly used are as follows:
software and other resources c) implementation, the Business Activity Modelling (BAM) - explicitly
process of making new system operational in thedescribes what goes on that part of the business
organisation, and d) Operation and maintenance, theunder investigation. The activities are defined from
process concerned with the operation of the system,purely a business rather than on IS perspective.
correcting any problems that may arise and ensuringRecommended approach to be used in the
that the system is delivering the anticipating benefits.construction of a BAM may be Soft System
The management of these processes can beMethodology (SSM), Functional Decomposition or
achieved and controlled using a series of techniquesResource Flow Diagrams.
and management tools which, collectively, tend to be Logical Data Modelling (LDM), representing
known as Structured Management System. Twosystem data, is applied throughout the life cycle to
important methodologies:  PRINCE (Projects IN aprovide the foundation of the new system;
Controlled Environment), and SSADM (Structured Work Practice Model (WPM) maps business
Systems Analysis and Designactivities onto the organisation structure defining user
Methodology),structured by the Central Computingroles to the underlying business activities.
and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA), are usedThe key important thing is the end-product. Each
widely in the UK public sector and in some Developingstep has number of tasks associated with it, most of
Countries, like Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal etc. Prior towhich lead to the creation or enhancement of
comment on the application of these methods in thestandard SSADM products. At the end of an SSADM
Developing Countries, it would be pertinent toproject the new system will be described by the sum
describe brief outlines of these methodologies.of these products. Products can be divided into three
It is a significant fact that PRINCE is a projectbasic groups: Processing, Data and System-User (or
management method; not system development,Human-Computer) Interface.
which covers the organisation, management andBy way of substantiating the Information System in
control of projects. Since its introduction in 1989,developing countries is a complicated virtual process,
PRINCE has become widely used in both the publicspecially in the public sector. With the growing needs
and private sectors and is now the UK’s dein the information age, and by the pressure from the
facto standard for project management. Althoughinternational donors , big and ambitious projects has
PRINCE was originally developed for the needs of ITbeen undertaken by the public sector in developing
projects, the method has also been used on manycountries . But due to the lack of standard
non-IT projects. PRINCE requires a dedicated teamprocedures and methodologies for IS development
to be established to manage and carry out eachcaused many projects to combat problems in the
project. It therefore aims to provide a supportingimplementation stage. Many projects failed to attain
framework between the current state of affairs andtheir business needs, as they were too large and
the planned future state. PRINCE focuses attentionhighly ambitious. Basic reasons for the project failure
on end-products rather than activities, ensuring thatin the developing countries can be characterised as
the organisation actually gets what it wants out ofthe following:
the project. Quality is seen as a necessary and Solving wrong problem;
integral part of the project and the focus on Technology led, not business;
end-products enables the criteria by which quality is Lack of major stakeholder involvement;
to be judged to be specified at the outset of the Experts lead, rather than facilitate;
project. It requires the development of a viable Lack of commitment and hidden agenda;
“business case” for the project at its outset Benefits not identified and quantified at outset.
and that the business case needs to be periodicallyNowadays, the developing countries are applying both
reviewed.PRINCE AND SSADM methodologies, the project
In PRINCE a project is regarded as having themanagement development techniques, specially
following characteristics:designed for IT projects, that are funded by the UK
 defined and unique set of technical products toDepartment for International development (DFID).
meet the business needs4.2 In Bangladesh , private sectors are advancing
 corresponding set of activities to constructwith IS development , but it is not the identical
those productssituation in the public sector. The reasons behind this
 certain amount of resourcesmay be the poor salary structure in the public
 finite lifespanservice, which never give confidence to the
 organisational structure with definedprospective talents and system designers to join the
responsibilitiespublic services. Most of the IT projects are donor
In such Management Structured System, anfunded; domestically financed IT projects rarely
approach to planning based on products rather thanexperience success like the donor projects.
activities and the use of this approach for the4.3 However, RIBEC (Reforms in Budgeting and
benefits. It also emphasises that projects needs toExpenditure Control) project, funded by DFID, has
define the ‘ shape’ or manageable phases ofbeen considered as the most successful project in
a project to promote sound business control. StagesBangladesh.
are characterised by the production of specificAt the early stage of RIBEC project (Phase 2), it
products. The PRINCE model for projects is based onwas observed that, the project was design to
two main principles:develop and modernise the budgeting and accounting
The project is a joint responsibility between users,system of the government of Bangladesh. The
the developers and the organisation for whoseexperts mainly dominated that phase, including lots of
benefit the end-product is being developedthings to cover. There was lack of stakeholders'
In order for projects to succeed, a special structureinvolvement; problems were not recognised at the
is demanded to manage the project throughout itsinitial stage. Only a range of high-grade staff in the
life - from conception through build to handover. Thisrelevant field was given a general IT training. There
structure is distinct from normal line management.was no follow up; no visible product was seen.
By Using these principles, the model defines threeBenefits were not identified. No system was
levels of activity:developed to automate the budgeting and accounting
Overall project management and major decisionsystem. So this phase 2 had experienced a massive
makingfailure. Having awful experience, the following phase
Day-to-day management(2A and 2B), a downsized project with specific
Production of end-productsoutput targets came up with analysing user
These three levels of activity are assignedrequirements. This phase focused on sustainability and
respectively to the Project Board, to the Project andproved successful with sustainable solutions especially
Stage Managers, and to the Technical Teams. Thein the software development for budgeting and
latest version of the method, PRINCE 2, is aaccounting Substantive training had been offered to
process-based approach for project managementthe users of the systems. Stakeholders have been
providing an easily tailored, and scaleable method forinvolved in the software development process and
the management of all types of projects. Eachthe local vendors who will be easily available in the
process is defined with its key inputs and outputsfuture, developed the systems. Following PRINCE and
together with the specific objectives to be achievedSSADM as methods for project management and
and activities to be carried out. In the followingsystem development, RIBEC project is now
diagram, the process-based approach is shown:considered as a model for other projects which
Structured Management  Process Modelimplies the potential scope for applying these
Such Standard Method  provides benefits to themethodologies.Financial Management Project for HMG
organisation, as well as the managers and directors ofNepal has been designed to establish a reliable
the project, through the controllable use of resourcesdatabase to ensure user friendly and reliable financial
and the ability to manage business and project riskinformation and to computerise budgetary system.
more effectively. PRINCE enables projects to have:CCTA guidelines for IS strategy including PRINCE and
 a controlled and organised start, middle and end;SSADM were followed in developing the system.  In
 regular reviews of progress against plan andPakistan, Lahore WASA project experienced badly as
against Business Case;the original proposal was too big and not phased
 flexible decision points;project; no analysis of business needs, solution was
 automatic management control of any deviationstechnology led, benefits were not identified at
from the plan;outset, high risk strategy, questionable long-term
 the involvement of management andsustainability, lack of training facilities and computing
stakeholders at the right time and place during theskill within organisation etc. So, 2 years’ costs
project;and effort were wasted.
 good communication channels between theBy taking into consideration the UK approach of
project, project management, and the rest of theproject management, Lahore WASA claim to be
organisation.successor and benefits are realised especially in the
There is no denying the fact that SSADM is a highlybilling from bimonthly billing to daily billing and reduction
structured and rigorous method of systemsin bill production cycle. The main project management
development ,was originally developed by Learmonthapproach in the new proposal includes: redefinition of
and Burchett Management System (LBMS) followingpurpose, identify business benefits, prioritise outputs,
an investigation by the CCTA into adopting ainvolvement of stakeholders, DIFID played the role
standard Information System (IS) developmentas the facilitator not doer, ownership of solution by
method for use in UK government projects. It wasstakeholders, use of local consultant etc, phased
launched in 1981 and by 1983 became mandatory fordevelopment, distributed system.
all the government IS developments. This gaveIn view of the above it is evident that
SSADM a large toehold in the IS structured methods‘Information technology and Information
market.systems for what they really are - powerful and
It is a prerequisite for SSADM that user commitmentvaluable tools, but not magic. When applied
and involvement are agreed right from the start. Itthoughtfully, these tools can bring important benefits
provides a top-down approach, where a high levelfor individuals, organisations, and customers. When
picture is drawn up and subsequently refined intomisapplied, they can waste tremendous amounts of
lower levels of detail. One extremely importanttime, effort, and money’.The USA, a Progressed
concept in SSADM is the distinction between logicaland well structured country that is economically and
and physical views of system components.technologically advanced, designed PRINCE AND
The following purpose are generally fulfilled by suchSSADM, to meet their own requirements. It cannot
important methods.be expected that these structured methodologies
 Provide a sound platform for communicationswould equally suit the resource scarce developing
between analysts, designers and users;countries. But the above discussions surmise that
 Reduce errors and gaps in the specificationthere is potential scope and rationale for applying
producedPRINCE AND SSADM that would facilitate the
 Improve the quality of software documentationdeveloping countries for better project management
and the productivity of analysts;and system development. But again, these
 Reduce potential risks by presenting analystsmethodologies need not be considered as the “
with a structural framework for the use offinal conclusive critics”, rather these structural
techniques, and a standard for documentationcriteria should be used thoughtfully, tailored to
end-products;manage projects efficiently and to develop effective
 Provide techniques for checking completenessinformation systems to cope with the challenge of
and accuracy;change Management virtually.
 Improve the maintainability of the new systems;