Industrialization in India

"Smoke is an indication of work . . . therefore, we arethe rich while assigning lower priority to the needs of
proud of our smoke."those who exert weaker demand." Henceforth, the
Reactions to the thoughtless acquisition and utilizationwealthy are now able to maintain their historic
of introduced technology in Southern India.dominance over the resources of the world through
"Developing countries must not and will not allowtheir access to technology.
themselves to be distracted from the imperatives ofIn Bangalore, the unequal distribution of technological
economic development and growth by the illusoryaccess and the resulting class disparities is
dream of an atmosphere free from smoke or ademonstrated with exceeding bluntness. The
landscape innocent of chimney stacks." -A.K.N. Reddypurveyor of wealth in this city is the information
In A.K.N. Reddy's essay, "Technology, Development,technology industry, and access to technological
and the Environment: An Analytical Framework,"whichknowledge is necessary to reap the benefits of this
was included in Ramachandra Guha's Social Ecology,economic sector. Throughout Bangalore, huge IT
he asserted that modern societies are developing andskyscrapers rise out of stick and stone slums, the
utilizing technologies that are perilous to theirdoors of business that cater to the technological
environmental and social ecosystems withoutclasses are guarded against the intrusion of outsiders,
recognition of the inherent risks. He also addressesand the complexes of the technological elite are
how the technologies of the developed world are,walled off so that they cannot even be viewed, let
"...in the process of massive transfer to thealone accessed, by the commoner in the streets. The
developing world," and the increased degradation thattrickle-down effect does not seem to operate here,
these societies have undergone as a result. Inas money seems to stay within class sanctioned
response, I intend to address the essay's majorcyclic rounds; upper-class shops and restaurants for
points, as well as apply them to my surfaceupper-class individuals, lower-class ones for the
observations of the impact that such technologieslower-class. In India, more than most other countries,
have had on Southern India.it is access to technology that allows one to obtain
Reddy began his essay with a synopsis of the majorand maintain affluence; class is now not only
criticism against modern technology. He first dividedmaintained my social lines but by technological ones
these criticisms into three categories- environmental,as well. This dichotomy between the upper and lower
economic, and social- and then applied themclasses seems to have created two completely
separately to fit the particular contexts of developedseparate spheres of Indian society which are
and the developing countries. In my use of Reddy'sdeveloping away from each other at an ever
framework in application to my observations ofincreasing pace. The culture, beliefs, and, most
Southern India, I have allowed the initial three criticismpertinently, experiences of the technology class are
classes to stand, but I have omitted the laterquickly becoming so radically different from that of
distinction; as I believe that, in the intervening yearstraditional, rural India that social upheaval is eminent.
since Reddy's article was written (1979), the impactsThe final criticism which Reddy makes is that
of modern technology have had similar impacts (on aintroduced modern technologies carry with them
varying scale) on both sets of societies.major social consequences for developing nations.
The first of Reddy's criticisms focused on theAgain, the primary focus of his argument was on the
environmental impacts of modern technology. Heclass aspects of this issue and how access to
wrote that the influx of such technology has had atechnology is a major point of contention between
horrendous impact on the natural world and this, invarious levels of social strata. He pointed out that,
turn, has not, ". . . resulted in an environment moreeven though the benefits of technology are out of
conducive to the physical and mental well-being ofreach for the poor, they still have, "to live cheek by
man." Reddy goes on to say that the modernjowl with its unpleasant features such as pollution."
technologies which humans have created and areReddy expands his criticism by stating that modern
currently implementing on a mass scale aretechnology changes the face of labor by introducing
threatening us in all aspects of our lives. He statesmechanistic means of mass-production which cause
that, ". . . with the increasing deployment of modernthe depreciation of traditional craftsmanship. Inherent
technology, man's welfare has been threatened byto the introduction of new technologies, employees
the escalating levels of pollution- pollution of the airwho manufacture goods no longer need to possess
that he breathes, the water that he drinks, the foodany strong base of knowledge or skill; as their role is
that he eats, the quietness that he needs, and thereduced to that of machine.
beauty of nature that he enjoys."Under this new system of industrial production, "only
The above statements in regard to the subsequenta few [workers] are required to possess a high
environmental impact of modern technology aredegree of intellectual capability and/or manual skills,
readily apparent to anyone who has ever tried towhile the barest minimum of intelligence and dexterity
venture down Bangalore's traffic packed streets. Theis expected from the vast majority of the working
shear amount of automobiles, rickshaws, and bussesforce. To this majority, 'soul destroying, meaningless,
have long ago exceeded the city's carrying capacity,mechanical, monotonous, moronic work is an insult to
and it regularly takes over an hour to travel whathuman nature . . .'" The extended result of this is
would otherwise be a short journey. I wouldemployment that is neither particularly difficult nor
speculate that it would be much quicker to walkdesirable and the creation of a sharp division
within the city rather than use public transport if itbetween work and leisure time. This division of time
were not for the fact that it regularly takes over tenis in direct contrast to the traditional manner of
minutes to simply cross a street. Another effect ofproduction, in which work was also a livelihood.
this traffic influx is that the air is completely chokedThis degradation of work is also clearly evident in
with automobile exhaust. During rush hour theBangalore. Many of the top jobs in this city are in the
exhaust cloud is so thick that it often times becomesIT sector and, while they necessitate advanced
difficult to see through it to the other side of thedegrees and evidence of learning, they are incredibly
street.basic. In fact, in western countries, these jobs are
Bangalore's exhaust forms a thick blanket over theonly occupied by people who have the barest
entire city and its presence is ever-present- its smell,minimum of education and skills. It is India's finest,
taste, and grit constantly barrage one's sensorymost educated, youth who are engaging upon IT
faculties. These emissions cause lungs to ache andcareers that can neither stimulate nor educate them
many of the city's residents often wake at nightany further. The social impacts of having such large
gasping for breath. The effects of long-termnumbers of highly educated people engaged in the
exposure to this pollution can scarcely be fathomed.most base of professions can only be speculated. But
The next criticism that Reddy acknowledges has toI feel that these effects can potentially seep deep
do with the fact that new technologies causedown into the educational institutions of India. For
economic disparities which impact all spheres ofwhere exactly is the impetus to educate people in
industrializing society. In a culture that is centeredpreparation for moronic employment? I do not know.
upon modern technology, the ability to access it isA.K.N. Reddy's essay very keenly strikes the
absolutely necessary for an individual to be able tocriticisms of modern technology right on the head.
participate in the macro-economy. In order for one toAlthough he authored it nearly thirty years ago, his
be able to access the new technologies they mustwarnings remain as pertinent today as they ever did;
be a member of the particular wealthy andespecially for developing nations such as India. As I
comfortable classes who, essentially, control it. This inhave attempted to demonstrate, many of his
turn causes major divisions between the haves- whospeculations about how industrializing countries would
use new technologies to their ever increasingabsorb modern technology have actually occurred,
advantage- and the have nots- who are outside ofand India is quickly becoming the wasteland that
the technological pail. Reddy wrote, "and thus, oneReddy prophesized. Most importantly, Reddy's
comes to the next turn of the spiral . . . thewritings force us to take a proverbial step back to
increased inequality resulting from the initial unequaltake a look at where our society is going; they make
access to the new technologies stimulates theus to realize that we do not have to destroy our
development of further advances in technologyecosystem to survive, that we do not have to work
which will then accentuate the inequality even more.menial jobs, that we canquestion the broader impacts
This intensity of class divisions also manifests itself inof our collective actions. Who wants to wait ten
the dispersal of resources. In a society that hasminutes just to cross the street? Who wants to be
profit as its primary aim, far more emphasis is placedconstantly poisoned by exhaust fumes? Who wants
upon the moneyed (technological) minority at theto live in a deeply bi-furcated society? Who wants to
exclusion of the poorer (technology deficient)live in a world without forests, pure water, and fresh
majority. This grossly unequal dichotomy causes, ". . .air? Really, who? Then I must ask, in the spirit of
technology to respond more avidly to the needs ofR.K.N. Reddy, why are we doing this to ourselves?