Future Of Six Sigma - Different Viewpoints

Since its introduction in the 1990's, 6-Sigma hasachieving extraordinary results.
become the buzzword in both the manufacturing andThe Limited Use Of Six Sigma
service industries. The various methodologies used in6-Sigma gained prominence as an effective quality
6-Sigma are based on a disciplined and data drivenimprovement technique after it was successfully
approach that help in eliminating defects and achievingimplemented in Motorola. Since then, many large
near perfection by restricting the number of possibleorganizations have implemented 6-Sigma programs
defects to less than 3.4 defects per million. Theand improved the quality of manufactured goods or
methodologies are effective in managing businessservices rendered. However, the full potential of
processes of both the manufacturing and service6-Sigma has not been realized so far because many
industries. In manufacturing industries, the conceptscompetent small to medium level enterprises have still
and methodologies are used for reducing the numbernot implemented Six Sigma programs. These
of defects whereas in service industries, they areenterprises have all the resources to implement such
used mainly for reducing transactional errors.programs, but are often wary of the final
Although many companies have been successful incertification, as they believe that it is meant only for
reducing the number of defects through Six Sigmalarge organizations. These companies often do not
projects, the arguments raised against the efficacyrealize that 6-Sigma delivers the same benefits to
of 6-Sigma in all aspects of business processes still doboth large as well as small business enterprises. The
not seem to die down. Some management expertsonly difference may be in the volume of goods
think that Six Sigma is inherently flawed, as it doesmanufactured or services rendered.
not take into account the flaws that might beThe Future Of Six Sigma
present in the system itself. They are of the opinion6-Sigma may appear similar to other quality
that the analytical and statistical tools used in 6-Sigmamanagement tools such as TQM or Kaizen Events,
only expose flaws in the execution and do notbut in reality, it is quite different. Other quality
account for a process that itself is riddled withmanagement programs often reach a stage after
defects.which no further quality improvements can be made.
Supporters of Six Sigma offer a different viewpoint.6-Sigma, on the other hand, is different as it focuses
According to them, quality management tools such ason taking quality improvement processes to the next
Total Quality Management (TQM) and 6-Sigma arelevel. This means that 6-Sigma has the potential to
conceptually quite similar except for their labels.outlast other quality management programs in the
Business organizations may use any of these forfuture.
improving overall quality. However, they often giveThe scope of 6-Sigma is also much broader than
preference to 6-Sigma as they believe that Six Sigmaother quality management programs as it can be
is more than just a process improvement programapplied to every business process of an organization.
and is based on concepts that focus on continuousThe future is bright for 6-Sigma programs with the
quality improvements. They have the opinion thatgrowing awareness in small and medium enterprises
6-Sigma concepts combine statistical measurementabout the potential benefits that can be derived from
tools with contemporary management techniques forimplementing such programs.